First published in , it became a controversial handbook for guerrilla warfare and revolution, read alongside Che’s own pamphlets, with which it can compete. REVOLUTION? Armed Struggle and Political Struggle. In Latin America. Regis Debray. Translated from the author’s. French and Spanish by Bobbye Ortiz. raRss . The importance of Regis Debray in relation to the Latin American revolution stems from several things. He has broken from the rigid confines of European.
|Published (Last):||11 November 2014|
|PDF File Size:||6.7 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.48 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In Revolution Debray does not refer at all to his earlier estimate of the Bolivian situation. The point is that both forms exist in rural areas where a peasantry is relatively scattered and subject to a vicious military rule which seems invincible.
Military operations, political organizing, and the waging of agrarian reform in controlled areas go together.
Since that time the Bolivian miners have suffered massive defeats at the hands, of the Bolivian military beefed up by the Pentagon and the CIA. Preview — Revolution in the Revolution? It is with this last that we have to concern ourselves primarily because it is an essential need of the movement to draw the theoretical conclusions of the Cuban experience and to apply them to Latin America generally. Trivia About Revolution in the Debray is preoccupied with the situation of Christian minorities in the Near East and with the status of the Holy Places in Jerusalem, Bethlehem and elsewherea traditional interest of the French state, and has established an observatory to monitor the situation.
From Global to Local. Return to Book Page. Unbound Worlds Exploring the science fiction and fantasy universe.
He wrote the book Revolution in the Revolution? Please help by adding reliable sources.
Since there is no revolutionary movement, military or political, that can live without constantly testing and refining its tactics and its strategy through trial and error, this gives Debray a grasp on a small piece of the truth.
His recent work investigates the religious paradigm as a social nexus able to assist collective orientation on a wide, centuries-long scale. To ask other readers questions about Revolution in the Revolution? A completely romantic and idealist edbray of class which forms an essential basis debrah the whole book.
That is not always possible. Lucid and compelling, it spares no personage, no institution, and no concept, taking on not only Russian and Chinese strategies but Trotskyism as well. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. The task of every revolutionary is to create the revolution.
Not revoultion word that Debray himself once thought the Bolivian struggle to be quite exemplary.
Nov 07, Pages. This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification.
Revolution in the Revolution? Armed Struggle and Political Struggle in Latin America
Cuba has shown the way. The importance of Regis Debray in relation to the Latin American revolution stems from several things. This slow climb from tactics to surrounding and corresponding strategy, along with the experience gained at all intermediate stages, is to some extent the history of the Cuban Revolution. Nicole rated it it was ok Recolution 05, There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Blood of the Liberals.
Revolution in the Revolution?
Retrieved from ” https: The function of the foco as of the SNCC workers was to show that this power was not invincible, either by getting away with military opposition or by challenging its laws and customs openly and engaging the support of other sections of the country.
Revolution in the Revolution? Rick Mercer Final Report. I sat on this one several years before finally getting down to read it. He was also involved in the development of ij government’s official ceremonies and recognition of the bicentennial of the French Revolution. Economics for the Many. Response to a newly organized guerrilla foco may take some time.
Chris rated it liked it Jan 07, He also deplored the influence of the “videosphere” on modern politics, which he claimed has a tendency to individualize everything, forgetting both past and future although he praised the loss of s ” messianism “and rejecting any common national project. After two years, all of this is abandoned, social analysis is rejected, even strategy is rejected, and the foco becomes the debraj and end of revolutionary wisdom, completely self-contained, responsible to nothing and to no one.
Aug 29, Karlo Mikhail rated it liked it Shelves: Want to Read Currently Reading Read.
Revolution in the revolution? | Open Library
Inspired by Your Browsing History. Want to Read saving….
The Essential Debate on the Constitution.